The upcoming JW3 film - Sep 25

To continue talking about movies and their trailers, let us get the obligatory disclaimer out of the way: real life sucks. More specifically, I do not like climate warning, but I have to admit that I like young Ms. Thunberg even less: her belligerent approach is the last thing the world needs, and her entourage is somewhat reminiscent of the Hitler youth from the 1920s and 30s, which is bad.

Pause. The year 2019 – since we are talking about movies and related memorabilia – saw the release of the movie ‘JoJo Rabbit’, where the titular character has an imaginary friend. The friend’s name is Adolf Hitler, and the movie is not a horror like the ‘It’ franchise is, but is supposedly more light-hearted.

I do not like censure and censorship, but I have to admit that I am on board with the RF government on this one: they refused to show this movie in their country. You just don’t mess with some things, and to someone like them, ‘JoJo Rabbit’ may seem like an early half-assed attempt to re-write history by pretending that Hitler (and his regime) was imaginary, and the WWII was all the Communists’ fault, and all the information to the contrary is fake news. It is paranoid, yes, but some things you just do not fiddle with, not unless you want to set-off a chain reaction.

…The Donald appears to have set-off a chain reaction again, seeing how he has twitted a Tweet or two regarding Ms. Thunberg; the tweet is supposed to be taking sarcastically and despairingly, but, sadly, there is no indication that he isn’t trying to be genuinely nice here. Of course, he may also be genuinely trying to get himself impeached, but this is not my point here; my point here is that Ms. Thunberg’s take on things sometimes isn’t too different from the Donald’s; Ms. Thunberg has Asperger’s, (or something similar); what about the Donald? Is he conventionally sane, even? Maybe the good politicians of Washington D.C. just should have him assessed, and-

-and what if he is mentally or psychologically deviant? Then what? Aside from the fact that part of the reason as to why hasn’t been impeached up to date because if he does, his role will be taken over by Mike Pence, who is feared and hated, (whereas the Donald himself is more like hated and reviled instead), then where does it leave the U.S.? With a president that really conventionally not sane? With a president who has been removed for precisely the same reason, yet who had been competent enough to get himself elected in the first place? Somewhere else? Hypothetical, let alone real-life, situations like this one can cause the West to re-evaluate its’ values, something that it really does not want – but we have digressed.

Let us talk about movies… apolitical movies. How about the third ‘Jurassic World’ film? It will feature not just the new-original cast, but also the original cast – Ian Malcolm, Dr. Alan Grant, and Dr. Ellie Sattler. Put otherwise, we can safely say that this reboot of the JP franchise ran out of steam and ideas. Both the ‘Fallen Kingdom’ film and the BBR short feature depicted humans living in a new ‘Jurassic World’, co-existing with dinosaurs and other formerly extinct Mesozoic monsters, now reborn thanks to Dr. Wu and his wizardry. That is a good enough concept, but somehow the first two ‘Jurassic World’ films did not really do it justice; the BBR short feature did a better job, but it really isn’t that much different from the ‘Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom’ film with some elements of the ‘Jurassic Park: The Lost World’ movie thrown in. Yes, it has done its’ job in getting people excited once more about dinosaur movies… but only to a limited extent. The first two ‘Jurassic World’ movies just dropped the ball too much as far as most of the audience members believe, and it is unlikely that the third film will change this state of affairs. Anything else?

There is now a trailer for a film named ‘Primal’, that is supposed to come out later this year or sometime around that. It features a ship in a storm, where a dangerous convict has escaped and released the rest of the ship’s cargo, including a white jaguar. What is the punchline?

There are no white jaguars; there are white tigers and lions, (and boy, are they a real-life mess and a half), but not white jaguars or leopards. (There may be albino jaguars and leopards, but I have not heard of them either). The black or melanistic jaguars and leopards are called black panthers, a fact that became quite known since MCU’s ‘Black Panther’ film, but white jaguars and leopards just do not exist. Put otherwise, ‘Primal 2019’ is just as fantasy and unreal as ‘Frozen II’ will be, (or ‘Frozen I’, for that matter). Still, jaguars don’t appear in movies very often, (even as just monsters – judging by the trailer, the white jaguar could just as well been an Indoraptor from the JP franchise, both animals do about as much and are just as real), so hopefully I will be able to see ‘Primal 2019’ (or whatever), when it comes on screen…

Well, this is it for now. See you all soon!

New Frozen II trailer - Sep 24

Obligatory disclaimer: real life sucks. The Americans, however, tend to put their own spin on this fact. No, I’m not talking about the Donald – after all the months and years of his fellow American politicians blathering about the Russian interference in the last election, he openly half-offered half-tried to force the current Ukrainian government to investigate Hunter Biden, Joe Biden’s son; given that the Ukrainian-Russian relations are still very bitter, (though there is something of a thaw between them now that Ukraine has a new president), this feels something like a joke that is done badly and gone badly. Does the Donald want to be impeached? In the years past, since he ascended to the White House, sometimes it did feel like this sometimes, but maybe it’s just the Donald being himself. We will just have to see if or how he gets out of this one. (In addition, the same goes for the Biden family, actually). No, rather, I am talking about George Lucas – the man of the week has opened his mouth and proclaimed that no, he did not like how ‘The Last Jedi’ the movie depicted his world.

Sigh. Lately it feels as if the Disney/SW juggernaut is doing its’ damnedest best to change the public’s opinion regarding it, (remember, ‘Solo’ the movie only brought in millions of dollars, not billions that the juggernaut is used to, these days), by flooding the comic scene with the SW comics that often have some, mmm, ‘insightful’ essays in the conclusion of each individual comic, and by bringing forth, (well, it’s about to bring forth), ‘the Mandalorian’ on Disney+, a show that is supposed to show how the First Order came to power – a Sequel Trilogy’s prequel, if you will. And then along comes Mr. Lucas and makes his statement, and the juggernaut is in hot water again. Maybe they really should quit while they are still ahead after the upcoming SW9 movie – nah. They will ride this franchise until it can run no more, and then they will boil it for glue and sell this glue, and patent this glue, and use this glue in their new money-making programs – ahem. The new trailer for the upcoming ‘Frozen II’ movie has come out. Let’s talk about some of its’ aspects.

In this adventure, Elsa and her team go into some enchanted forest, because some magical music/singing/humming is haunting Elsa and it makes her own innate frost magic go berserk. Ergo, Elsa and her team go into an enchanted forest, where she meets (or will meet) various new characters, some human, but others certainly not.

First, there are stone giants, bigger even than the ice monster that Elsa created in the first ‘Frozen’. Normally, I would say that those are trolls – in the post-antique Scandinavia, trolls were humanoid creatures of giant size that were made from stone or turned to stone in daylight, or both. However, in the world of ‘Frozen’ trolls are smaller than humans are, and are rather reminiscent of dwarves of the Norse myths instead.

In the pagan Norse myths dwarves themselves tended to turn to stone in sunlight, which was why they lived below ground, (duh); as Scandinavia turned from paganism to Christianity, (and that was a painful process in itself), the lines between dwarves and trolls blurred – but the height difference remained. Trolls were human-sized or larger, while dwarves were smaller. In-between the two was the huldra – a humanoid creature that looked like a human in the front, but had a hollow back as well as a fox’s or a cow’s tail. (There’s a possibility that huldra has reached the Russian lands and assimilated into Russian folklore as mavka – a variant rusalka that looks human in the front, has a hollow or a transparent back, and is an undead rather than a fey creature). The Scandinavians treated the huldras not unlike how the English, Scots, Irish and Welsh treated fairies and elves – they were not inherently evil, but much more powerful than ordinary humans are, with plenty of tricks up their sleeves and a short temper. Sometimes huldras married mortals and took them into their land beneath the hills. Other times they would go and live with their human husbands, (huldras usually are depicted as females), but usually those stories ended badly for both sides. Where were we?

Oh yes, the new ‘Frozen II’ trailer. It’s unknown if it is a huldra is doing the humming that gets beneath Elsa’s skin literally, (unlike the Greco-Roman sirens huldras usually didn’t lead men to their deaths by singing), but as we were talking about, Elsa and her friends are encountering stone giants of some sort, and since those cannot be trolls, (not ‘Frozen’s’ trolls anyhow), they might be stone giants slash Jotuns of the Norse myths. Unlike the trolls of the Christian Scandinavian period, the pagan Jotuns were not affected by the sun; in fact, at the time of Ragnarok, a couple of Jotuns in shape of giant wolves will swallow the sun and the moon instead! The trailer of ‘Frozen II’ too has those stone giants walking around in daylight and throwing rocks around and being completely unaffected by the sun.

And then we have Elsa going against the sea, (as she had done in the first trailer for ‘Frozen II’, remember?), and fighting-slash-taming what appeared to be a sea horse. This may be Disney’s idea of a kelpie, or it is an each-uisge, instead. Both of those creatures were water spirits or water demons, shapeshifters – sometimes that appeared to be human, and sometimes to be horses – and man-eaters, (and the each-uisge was even more vicious than the kelpie was). Either way, Elsa can be in for some interesting times, if she decides to keep her new ride, no matter how sweet it may be. (Water horses were supernaturally strong and fast, duh). So this leaves us where?

In a reboot from the first ‘Frozen’ movie, of course. In the first movie, (vaguely based on Andersen’s ‘Snow Queen’ fairy tale), the theme was about a human, who thought that she was a monster, (Elsa), vs. a monster who thought himself as a human, (Hans). (Ok, the last bit might have been rather strong, but the bloke deserved it). In the final scenes of the first movie, his highness appeared to be more sympathetic than when he was at his worst, but now there’s no sign of him, (and I don’t think that too many people miss him either), and instead we have Elsa and her people going Norse, (re the Jotuns and co.) with a completely different feel to the new movie already. Where this will lead to within the universe of Disney animated movies? We will just have to wait and see.

…This is it for now. See you all soon!

Ad Astra - Sep 21

Obligatory disclaimer: real life sucks. So, let us talk about something different for a change – the 2019 movie ‘Ad Astra’. Warning, we are going to be talking about this movie at length, so today’s article will have plenty of spoilers! …Starring Brad Pitt and a fine-supporting cast, AA is… depressing as Hell, and makes some smart strategies by focusing on either close-up shots of the manly profile of Mr. Pitt, the amazing eyelashes of Ms. Negga, (which is one of the main reasons I went to watch AA, I admit), the hirsute face of Mr. Jones and son – or it making wide, far-sweeping, panoramic shots of space. Consequently, it manages to avoid the fact that its’ plot is rather sinewy and sickly, metaphorically speaking – and where to begin?

First, with the range of emotions – there really is not any. Mr. Pitt’s McBride-son, since he is the main character of AA – period, it is all about him and his father, (played by Mr. Tommy Lee Jones, again), everyone else are just passers-by in his life. No wonder that his wife, (played by Ms. Taylor),  has left him within the movie framework and is barely there from the script’s P.O.V. – she’s superfluous, you can replace her, say, by Ms. Negga’s character and the plot off AA will barely be affected. In an age of political correctness, this sort of male-centrism sounds kind of politically obtuse, but because it’s a space opera, no one seems to give a damn, plus September 2019 has given us ‘Hustlers’, so everyone might also be distracted by them too.

Back to emotions – there really are not any. None of the main characters display any. Between AoS and ‘Preacher’, as an example, we know that Ruth Negga can be very emotional, with a great range of facial features – but here we do not see any. To Tommy Lee Jones’ credit, he makes his McBride-father character sound like a major egotistical asshat without displaying any emotions: he may be completely deranged, in a captain-Ahab-like manner, but his face? About as emotionless as his son’s.

Moreover, this applies to the minor characters too. Finn’s Stroud, Ortiz’s Rivas and Hamilton’s Vogel appear only in one scene at the beginning, and this is it, yet they are have blank, featureless, emotionless faces that the rest of the cast also has. Mr. Donald Sutherland tries to make his character – Pruitt – to be more impressive, the heretic, but the good colonel is written out of the story by the end of the first third of the movie. That much for him.

…Actually, the good colonel’s character, (as in ‘movie character’ suffers another flaw): there is no back-story for him. When Mr. Sutherland first appears on screen, the audience may be distracted somewhat by his attempts to give colonel Pruitt some facial expressions, (and he succeeds, landing firmly in the ‘deranged owl’ territory of faces), but not enough not to miss that Pruitt and McBride-son have history together. Indeed, as the movie progresses, we learn that Pruitt and McBride-father have worked on the Lima project together, and there was a falling-out, and things ended badly between them. This is just a step in the process to make McBride-son realize that either something has went very badly and very wrong for his father, or his father isn’t the man that McBride-son always thought that he was – and that thought has driven McBride-son hard enough into making him into the man that he became by the beginning of the film.

However! None of the audience knows this, not immediately, and even after they do, all they see is a complete stranger, approaching Pitt’s McBride-son’s character and immediately hitting it off as the old friends that they supposedly are. In actuality, all that Sutherland’s Pruitt-character does is to give some cryptic info about McBride-father to McBride-son, as well as a memory stick with more cryptic info. And then he gets seriously shot and wounded by the space pirates on the Moon and was written out of the story.

Right. The space pirates. They were the random monster of the Moon arc. Because McBride-father had been a semi-deranged sociopath with a complete disregard for his fellow man, including his family and himself, but was presented to everyone as a dashing explorer and hero, things have to be very hush-hush for McBride-son to get to Neptune and retrieve him…only not. McBride-son had been lied to, and the military top brass decided that it was important for him not to know it, and that laid the seeds for the Martian portion of the movie, and its’ conflict.

Pause. On Mars, this is where the human b-story of the movie – McBride-son is going through the Solar System to discover the truth about his father, while various human factors try to help and hinder him – are the strongest. There, he gets some proof that his father is alive, but the military is cutting him out, because he has done his part and can be removed. Ruth Negga’s character – Helen Lantos – helps him get onto the rocket that goes after his father all the same… and it can be noted that while Helen Lantos is as bland and emotionless as McBride-son is, Ruth Negga is a good enough actress that you can almost see some of her Raina character fro, AoS shining through, as Lantos treats McBride-son not unlike how Raina treated Grant Ward at the final episodes of AoS S1 – but we’re not going there.

Instead, we are going off to Neptune. The remaining crew of that space ship, Cepheus, were actually government’s assassins, sent to off McBride-father, (and probably the son too), now that colonel Pruitt is out of commission and can no longer handle any McBrides. However, secondly, they are the most incompetent assassins, McBride-son is able to kill them despite his best intentions, which is sad, and firstly, there had been the Norwegian biostation in space. It sent out a mayday signal, and the then-captain of Cepheus decided to go there. There was a conflict with McBride-son, who wanted to get to Mars ASAP to continue to his quest for his father, but the then-captain of Cepheus channeled his inner child and told McBride-son very pointedly that this was his ship, so he’s the one who decides what their actions will be, so McBride can either tell them what’s the big rush to Mars is all about, or he can take over Cepheus and make all the choices himself. On one hand, this makes no sense – the crew of Cepheus were apparently in on the secret op – to find and destroy McBride-father, on the other, it is pointless: McBride was never the one to shirk responsibility, as the opening scenes of the movie showed: he put on a spacesuit and went forth to fix the robotic arm on the space station that he was upon, even though it wasn’t really his job, so the entire scene of getting McBride-son and the then-captain onto Cepheus is just painful.

But then they got onto the biostation and its’ monkeys. Monkeys come in all shapes, sizes and species, so some dumb-ass decided to use some of Earth’s biggest monkeys in an enclosed environment – drills. At 70 cm long, and weighing-in at about 50 kg, drills and their closest relatives the mandrills, are some of the largest primates there is, second only to the great apes in stature, but unlike them, and like their more distant baboon relatives, these monkeys are armed with powerful jaws and long sharp teeth – and have tempers to match.

…No, drills and mandrills are not baboons, though they are usually confused with them, ever since TLK-94, where Rafiki – a mandrill – not only had a baboon-like tail, but also ID’s himself as a baboon, (seriously, look it up on that video. It is right when he meets the grown-up Simba for the first time). AA’s drills also have them, as do the mandrills featured in the second Jumanji movie reboot. In real life, they only have short tails, not really noticeable in all that fur.

Back to AA and its’ space opera. As it was said already, some idiot decided to manage some of Earth’s biggest and strongest monkeys in an enclosed space, even though monkeys are very good at escaping their enclosures…which is why in real life, baboons, drills & mandrills aren’t really used in labs; instead, it is their macaque cousins, (such as the rhesus macaque), that are used there. Those primates aren’t as big and strong as the baboons, drills & mandrills are, and their teeth aren’t as big and sharp, but they can have ugly tempers, especially the sexual mature males – but where’s the blood? Aside from some scratches on the walls, (and monkeys don’t have claws, unlike big cats or bears, someone has really dropped the ball on their zoology there), there’s no blood or corpses, except for the first captain of Cepheus, who ran into the escaped monkeys on the space biostation and got his face ripped off for his trouble, because, yes, drills and mandrills are big enough and strong enough to do that – see above. So, why there aren’t more corpses?

Because either this was some sort of a trap for McBride after the moon pirate ambush failed, or it is a plot oversight. I am leaning towards the latter, but, still, common sense? You are going into space in an enclosed, closed, and self-sustaining space station, from which you cannot readily escape – and you are taking some of Earth’s biggest, strongest, and meanest monkeys with you. Obviously, there were some people alive long enough to send-out the mayday signal received by Cepheus, so something went even wronger after that – and it was the plot of AA.

Where were we? Oh yes, en route from Mars to Neptune. Some reviewers have hinted pre-release of AA that there is going to be a twist in the plot. After all the plot twists in MCU’s AoS, I was skeptical about this development, and I was right. The plot twist, apparently, was Space-Com’s turning onto the McBride family, as presented by three-slash-four of the most incompetent assassins that I have ever seen in movies and/or TV series. Some people point out that in this manner Roy’s journey mirrors his father’s – both men leave a trail of corpses in their wake even though they don’t intentionally mean to – but the way, for example, that Roy kills the assassins is really pitiful and annoying. Sometimes, McBride-son is more than competent enough to survive a crash alongside the crashing space station, to space-surf through the rings of Neptune, or to use the nuclear explosion of his father’s Lima project to jump-start his own journey home upon his now-battered space ship. However, when it comes to dealing with his father…

Now, let us not deny: McBride-father, Clifford, is a grade-a asshat, who abandoned his family, (namely, Roy and Roy’s mother, Clifford’s wife), in pursuit of his dream, of finding extraterrestrial life. He failed. In the world of AA, produced, co-written and directed by James Grey, there is no life on other planets, humanity is alone. Frankly, it makes the world of AA very depressing…which may be what Mr. Grey was planning all along, but we digress. The point is that Roy is smart enough, and competent enough, to do the above-mentioned feats of epic awesomeness and daring-do, yet he wasn’t smart enough to realize that his father might need some sort of meds, or to be subdued in some manner, or something, before they are going back home? Yes, Clifford is crazy enough, (or sane enough?) to play along until they are actually in space, after which he begins to fight his son tooth and claw, ready to kill both of them until Roy submits and cuts Clifford lose and off into the space he goes, where he has lived and killed and now will die. This very depressing, but is also a metaphor – Clifford is an albatross on Roy’s neck that needs to be cut loose for Roy to become a fully-rounded grown-up and get over his trauma of neglect. Sophocles’ king Oedipus rolls his eyes and gives Roy a Shirley Temple – lad, we have all been there, and you sure that your missus isn’t (kind of) reminiscent of your late mum? Sometime between concluding the Martian plot arc and starting the – Neptunian one, the movie’s script have done a complete turnaround, and rather than making the McBride-father a proper character, they reduced him to a plot device instead. Roy came to Neptune to prevent his (former?) superiors from killing his father and blowing up the Lima experiment – and he did just that on both counts. As far as plot twists go, this one ranks right there among the worst ones of MCU, for example, and we still have not hit upon one more very important plot hole.

Uranus. No, not ‘your anus’, be still my splitting sides, ha-ha, but Uranus, the seventh planet from the Sun, the one right there in the middle between Saturn and Neptune. Named after a figure in Greek mythology, the grandfather of Zeus and Hera, Uranus has the third largest planetary radius and the fourth largest planetary mass in the Solar System – a very notable planet, put otherwise. AA mentions it zero times and it is not shown at all in the entire movie, even though AA shows us some clear-cut shots of Jupiter and Saturn, never mind Neptune, which is the backdrop for the movie’s final act. What gives? It is a planet, so political correctness cannot be blamed for this one, (it may meddle with all sorts of aspects of Western life, but astronomy? Not so much), so I’m guessing that Mr. James Gray, who was making AA into the movie that was completely Sad and Solemn and Serious just couldn’t endure the thought that people in the audience will have involuntary chuckles when they hear the word ‘Uranus’ and promptly refused to have anything with the movie until the offending name, and the offending planet, were removed from the script, period. Consequently, ‘Ad Astra’ takes place in some alternate universe, where Earth is a part of Solar System that has no Uranus either because it never been in the first place, (yes, the formation of the Solar System and etc. during the Big Bang as we know it was touch and go during that initial time period), or because humans have blown it up somehow. And before you say that it’s impossible for our race slash species to blow up an entire planet I can only say that a) we haven’t invented the right way to do it yet, and b) we haven’t tried yet either, intentionally or otherwise. That said, if in the world of AA humanity did manage to blow up Uranus to a point where not even space/ice dust was left of it, (in real life, Uranus, just as Neptune, is an ice giant, whereas Jupiter and Saturn are gas giants, and Pluto isn’t even a planet anymore according to some sources), you would think that at some point of the movie this would’ve come up, because, hey, it’s an entire planet!.. Anything else?

No, that is it, actually. AA is a movie that has no humor, very little normal social interactions, is intentionally depressing as f- Hell, and sometimes unintentionally bizarre. Characters have no back story, they come and go in the great epic that is life and times of Roy McBride, just as they did in an equally great epic that was the life and times of Clifford McBride, an insane murderous fanatic and sociopath, (but hey! Product placement of NatGeo magazines! Money talks, baby!), so by cutting his father loose, literally and metaphorically, Roy now gets the chance to be his own man – a surprisingly small and simple message for such a pretentious movie.

…This is it for now, see you all soon!

AFO: Cougar vs. grey wolf - Sep 20

Obligatory disclaimer: real life sucks. In case of Canada’s current PM, Justin Trudeau, this is because he has worn blackface/brownface in the past, and now it came back to bite him in the ass. The photos really show him in an unflattering light, but are they causing him to lose?

Well, if he loses, those photos will certainly be one of the reasons, but not the only one. As compared to the U.S., where each new presidential election is a bigger show than the lost one, (a tendency that became really obvious since Bill Clinton became impeached), Canadian elections… are not. Maybe it is because Canada is still subjected to the U.K., whose queen (or king) can always interfere, overtly or covertly, unlike the U.S., which is its’ own, independent country, but another reason is that Canada and its’ politicians tend not to blame anyone else when things go wrong in their lives; Hell, Trudeau has already apologized for those photos and this approach seems to be working – certainly, at least some people are turning onto Mr. Scheer for failing to apologize in his turn – it happens. Where were we?

Oh yes, someone has pointed out that when in the past I was doing my going-through of the AFO episode list, I forgot to cover the ‘cougar vs. wolf’ episode, so I might as well do it for closure…

Right. So, in one corner we had the cougar, (also known as puma and mountain lion), and in the other – the grey wolf. (As opposed to its’ more ambiguous cousin the red wolf, I suppose). The grey wolf lost. Why?

…Because the wolf is not an individualistic fighter, but a team one. ‘The Velvet Claw’ series and the companion book are somewhat outdated by 2019, especially when it comes to taxonomy of carnivores, but they are correct in that the cats are individualistic fighters, and the dogs are not. The puma, the lynx, the tiger, and the domestic cat have their differences, but even at a first glance a complete amateur of zoology/biology will I.D. them as relatives, and their lifestyles are very similar too. The only outliers among the cat clan are the African lions and the African cheetahs, (for a while, there were lions and cheetahs in Asia too, but now the cheetahs seem to be extinct there, and the lions are doing barely better. Sad, this is), because they do live in social groups – the cheetahs in family coalitions, the lions are more derived. Why this is so, is another question, but for now let us focus on the fact that the wild cats, small and big, tend to be solitary. And dogs?

This is where it gets blurry. Actually, most wild dog species are solitary, behaving as, say, the red fox does – we’re talking small carnivores that live on their own or in family groups; some of them, such as the raccoon dog of Far East, (initially), and the maned wolf of South America, can look very exotic, but their lifestyles are similar. And then there are the pack hunters.

Who are they? They are the domestic dog, the wolf, (grey and red), the coyote, the jackals, also – the African wild dog, and the dhole of Asia. This is it, right?

…No, because there’s also the bush dog of South America; proportionally, it may be related closest to the aforementioned maned wolf, but whereas the maned wolf looks like a wolf, or a dog, on stilts, the bush dog looks like a mix between a basset hound and an otter; it doesn’t even bark, more like chirps and squeaks, and it can swim and attack its’ prey items in water, as well as on land. A very atypical dog, but then again, South America has plenty of atypical carnivores, period – but we digress.

Such outliers as the bush dog aside, most pack hunting dogs look the same – streamlined, long-legged, long-muzzled, big-eared and long-tailed… built not for strength, but for speed and endurance. These carnivores evolved to act in a pack, overwhelming their prey through numbers, and using their jaws to tear and rip it to pieces, sometimes even eating it while the prey animal is still alive. They are hunters rather than fighters, especially when it comes to other carnivores, such as big cats and bears, although when it comes to dominance fights within the packs…they are ritualized, actually, and usually are resolved through shows of strength… and then…

Well, there is a video clip on YouTube that shows a wolf pack taking down a coyote. While externally wolves and coyotes are similar, wolves are larger and bulkier than coyotes are… although now scientists know that they do interbreed with each other as well as the domestic dog species, creating such animals as the eastern wolf, the eastern coyote, and the red wolf. The last species may actually be a species, having evolved into taxonomic and biological independence from both grey wolves and coyotes, but we digress. Wolves have evolved to function within a social unit – their pack, with which they bring down their prey items, from rabbits and hares to white-tailed deer, elk, and even the American bison. On their own, wolves are not very effective, as compared to the great cats and bears.

…Now a puma, technically, is not a ‘great cat’ – it is a ‘small cat’: it cannot roar, it can mew like a domestic cat, (or a bobcat), does, and while the jaguar, (can be twice as heavy as the puma) dominates the parts of the New World in which it lives, the puma does not. It can break even with an American black bear, (sometimes), but a grizzly (or brown) bear overpowers it more often than not, and the same goes for the jaguar, (which is unquestionably the bigger and more powerful animal of the two), and even wolf packs. Pause. ‘Packs’ is the key word here. A wolf pack can stand up not just to the puma, but also to the American black bear, (the grizzly/brown bear is a tougher question to answer), but a solitary wolf is no match for even the puma – which is precisely what has happened down in the CGI simulation of that AFO episode. While the rest of the carnivores are a mixed bag, (though, again, the ‘jaguar vs anaconda’ episode was something else), solitary pack hunters, (it even sounds as an oxymoron), are fair game and just are not… up to their best game, (pardon the tautology here), when facing-off with anyone by themselves. The grey wolf just couldn’t win by itself, especially against a mountain lion, which might be small and light by ‘great cat’ standards, but it still packs a punch well above its’ weight. The ‘puma vs. grey wolf’ episode was actually good, because it was honest and straightforward – whatever else you can say about AFO, at least there weren’t any inconsistences and partisanship as there was, (sort of), in DW, but that is another story…

…Well, this is it for now – see you all soon!

The Fire Keeper - Sep 18

Obligatory disclaimer: real life sucks. Now let us talk about Ms. Cervantes’ latest YA novel, ‘the Fire Keeper’. A sequel to her earlier ‘Storm Runner’, ‘Fire Keeper’ is the Mesoamerican myths given the Riordan treatment, and-?

And here is the thing. ‘The Storm Runner’ had been a bad imitation of Riordan’s own ‘Lightning Thief’, his very first PJ novel ever. Ms. Cervantes’ novel replaced the mother with a dog, which made ‘Storm Runner’ a disturbing imitation of ‘the Lightning Thief’, as we have discussed it back in the past. The fact that Ms. Cervantes added some sort of a ‘shallow beautiful people are bad’ subplot only distorted her ‘Storm Runner’ further, making it an even more grotesque version of Riordan’s PJ novels at that time. And now it is the turn of ‘the Fire Keeper’. How is it holding up?

It is built less along the lines of Riordan’s PJ and friends novels, and more along the lines of his ‘Kane Chronicles’ trilogy. That trilogy is something of an odd duck in itself – somehow Riordan decided that Greco-Roman and Egyptian magics do not mix in a good way, and so the demigods of the former and the magicians of the latter must be kept separately; the only contact should be the Kane siblings themselves with Percy and Annabeth because of course it’s Percy and Annabeth. By contrast, the Greco-Roman crowd, (yes, primarily Percy and Annabeth again, but still), seems to be mixing freely with team Norse, (led by Magnus Chase and co) without any fallout. What gives?

One theory is that Mr. Riordan is running out of steam on a personal level and is relying on ghost writers to keep him going; as his own next novel – ‘the Tyrant’s Tomb’ – is supposed to hit the shelves later in fall 2019, we’ll have to look over and see. However, even if his own work is running out of steam, the ‘Rick Riordan Presents’ series is keeping on going. Yes, it is a more heterogeneous series than people, including Riordan himself, probably like – ‘Sal and Gabi Break the Universe’ is great, Ms. Chokshi’s ‘Aru Shah’ series is something else, (and we’ve discussed them at length in the past), and Ms. Cervantes’ Mesoamerican – pardon me, Maya – series isn’t very good; ‘the Fire Keeper’ in particular seems to be rushed in a forced sort of things; it still imitates Riordan’s own novels, just in a less specific manner.

Of course, on the other hand, we had Mr. Lee’s ‘Dragon Pearl’ YA novel, which tried to conflate a ‘Star-Trek-like’ sci-fi world with Korean mythology, and the result was kind of meh, not very good, certainly Mr. Lee didn’t return to the ‘Rick Riordan Presents’ series, and more importantly, ‘Dragon Pearl’ seems to have broken something; the first novels of Ms. Chokshi and Ms. Cervantes, as well as the ‘Dragon Pearl’ itself were very much advertised; the following novels, starting with the first ‘Sal and Gabi’ novel – not so much. Officially, the ‘Rick Riordan Presents’ series is planned-out all the way into the year 2020; unofficially, we just have to wait and see what develops. So far, it is a mixed bag and how it will turn out in the future is anyone’s guess.

...Well, this is it for now; see you all soon!

Donald R. Prothero & JP franchise - Sep 17

Obligatory disclaimer: real life sucks. It sucks for various reasons, and when you try to escape it, say, by reading Donald R. Prothero’s collection of dinosaur-related essays, named THE STORY OF THE DINOSAURS IN 25 DISCOVERIES, it sucks even more. Why?

Well, to be different, let us look at the ‘final’, twenty-fifth, discovery – ‘Triceratops’. What is it composed of? The first section – a collection of anecdotes regarding Cope & Marsh and Triceratops’ misadventures with them: Cope called it Agathaumas and assumed that it was a hadrosaur; whereas Marsh at first assumed that it was a giant prehistoric bison at first, (even though bison horns and Triceratops horns are very different). Ha-Ha. How humorous. These days, Cope & Marsh seem to be hybrids of paleontology’s founding fathers and Lewis Carroll’s Tweedledum and Tweedledee from his ‘Alice’ duology. Everyone and their dog know something about Cope and Marsh, especially in their homeland of USA, mainly that they were the first paleontologists there ever, that they participated in ‘Bone Wars’ that were half-grand and half-ridiculous… and this is it. There is even a ‘Weird West’ novel where some Native American shamans begin to animate dinosaur bones slash bring dinosaurs back to life, because the dysfunctional duo and their entourage have intruded on a holy site of some sort or another, ho-ho. Groan. The problem is not about the respect/disrespect of those two deceased worthies, but about the fact that everyone in the US and their dog knows that much about them, and is not impressed about it.

…Except maybe for the current POTUS and the rest of the D.C. crowd. There is a political cartoon on the DA site that depicts the two parties as flies that crawl over a chop of meat that is the country of USA. Frankly, it speaks to me.

‘Triceratops’ the chapter’s opening salvo begins with reused and recycled material that is on par of AoS & MCU reusing and recycling Hydra no matter what. They seem to be replacing them with the Kree in Spider-Man II, but then real life happened, apparently, somebody got scared or something, and Hydra is coming back instead, just because. The Disney/Marvel juggernaut does not do explanations; it just does whatever it wants. This attitude has aggravated the SW fans, cough, and so now that faction of the juggernaut is trying to win them back by SW comics, that these days contain various mini-essays about this or that SW character. Sigh. In today’s Western society, what is sauce for the goose-comics may not be sauce for gander-movies; the SW comics themselves aren’t exactly selling like hot cakes; maybe the upcoming ‘Mandalorian’ series, set in the era of the rising First Order, may do a better job – we’ll have to wait and see.

After the Cope & Marsh anecdote of the chapter, Mr. Prothero went into the biography of another prominent paleontologist – Mr. Hatcher, John Bell. And immediately the Triceratops angle of the chapter began to suffer, as the deceased was not just about the old three-horned face, but went all over the place, including Patagonia, to dig for extinct mammal fossils there. Where is the Triceratops?

In the historical anecdotes and vignettes, of course! Marsh was trying to write a monography on Triceratops and died; Hatcher picked up the slack and also died; it was up to Mr. Swann Lull to finish it. How exciting! …If you did not know about any of this thing, of course, but… However, these days the Western society is becoming increasingly stratified, and in case of paleontology, you either have heard it all before and are not impressed because Mr. Prothero is recycling the same old chestnuts, or you have not heard this before because you do not care about this, and therefore are not impressed for that reason instead. You can hit an owl with a stump, you can hit a stump with an owl, the end result is all the same: the stump is unaffected, the owl definitely is. Mr. Prothero? Your actual readers are your owl. Your essay collections are the stump.

…From the biography of Hatcher, where the Triceratops came and went, we go onto the third part of the chapter, which describes the Triceratops in general, from a biological/paleontological P.O.V., and again, it is all generic, it is basically a lite paraphrase of Wikipedia info. When in the 1970s USSR Nikolai Plavilshchikov released his book ‘Homunculus’, which was a collection of biographies of various scientists from the 17^th century to pre-revolutionary (and WWI) Europe and Russia, it was basically the same thing. Just with the emphasis not on dinosaurs, but on life sciences and scientists, and it is a more coherent book because it doesn’t try to combine dinosaurs with life histories of people in a medium of vignettes and anecdotes released as essays – no, it’s just a collection of vignettes and anecdotes, released at a time when Wikipedia and the Internet didn’t exist, (especially in the USSR), and as such ‘Homunculus’ came across, at least initially, as more original, even though the lay-out was the same – minimum text with maximum illustrations. Just no Wikimedia commons unlike the ’25 Discoveries’… because they did not exist of course, but we are not talking about Plavilshchikov here, but about Mr. Prothero. Did he skim on the Wikipedia? Oh yes he did, with ‘skim’ being the key word: as he is talking about Triceratops on the recent media, he talks about such pieces as – Walking with Dinosaurs. The horned dinosaurs in WWD were actually Torosaurus. In ’25 Discoveries’ you get the feeling that Mr. Prothero adheres to the theory that states that Torosaurus and Triceratops are two different dinosaurs, so why the conflation and confusion regarding the horned dinosaurs in WWD? There’s even ‘The Complete Guide…’ made by Impossible Pictures, the same company that made WWD, that succinctly describes Torosaurus and shows several photo stills of this bull lizard.

…Oh wait, there was a single dead Triceratops in WWD, as opposed to all the live Torosaurus. Nice eyes, Legolas, great generalization! What is next?

Mentions of the Jurassic Park franchise in all of its’ incarnations. The problem is that in JP3 there were no horned dinosaurs, especially in main roles, and neither were they in the first JW movie. Why did Mr. Prothero include those two movies? Because he was just skimming through the Wiki looking for Triceratops info and got complacent? Because just as Marsh (in the ‘Triceratops’ chapter) was putting his name onto his assistants’ work, so does Prothero have the ghost writers do all the work for him, and one of them decided ‘to stick it to the man’? Because Mr. Prothero knows that in the modern Western, (especially American and Canadian) society books aren’t really bought and/or read anymore, and his publication of ’25 discoveries’ and other books is just to stoke his own ego and to demonstrate to his friends, enemies, rivals and so on that he can afford to do this on his salary of ‘a paleontology and geology researcher, teacher and author’? Who knows… Which is where ‘Jurassic World Evolution’ comes in. Several weeks ago, it released the Nasutoceratops species profile, and began to look around for information sources beyond the Wikipedia about this dinosaur, and ’25 discoveries’ supposedly had it.

Only they do not. The only mention of the dinosaur in question is the author’s photo of the ‘family tree of ceratopsians at the Utah Museum of Natural History in Salt Lake City’. I have no idea what Mr. Prothero, his publisher, and the rest of the team were sinking, but the photo isn’t just black-and-white, isn’t just ‘meh’ in quality, but also made at such an angle that it is even harder to see and distinguish all of the skulls in the photo, let alone see what number goes with what skull. Did Mr. Prothero even get permission to photograph this ‘family tree’ or did he just photoshoot it once on the sly and got the hell out of there?.. However, we digress. What was the point, again?

…That JW: BBR, at its’ 8 to 9 minutes in length is precisely the dinosaur movie we deserve. Let us break it into acts. Act I – we meet the Motorhouse family. The actors are credited post-movie, aye, but their roles have no names, they are functions rather than people, apparently. They are shown to be your typical American family, racially diverse and woke, and yes, it is a double-edged sword of itself: when the movie is good, such as ‘Spider-Man II’, being woke makes it better; when the movie is bad, as it was in ‘Dark Phoenix 2019’, then wokeness will only make it worse. In BBR, the plot is so brief – the feature film itself is under 10 minutes, remember? – that it doesn’t matter whether or not this family is nuclear, composite, are its’ members WASPs or POCs – all it matters is that they saw a struggle of dinosaurs, then a carnivorous dinosaur attacked them, and they survived. The end. BBR has all the main characters of a JP franchise movie: dinosaurs & humans, and all the main themes of a JP franchise movie: dinosaur attack, human survival of the dinosaur attack, and human family issues. The only theme missing is the human corporate greed, (but then again, the JP3 film lacked it too), and the entire human mad science creating dinosaurs. JP3 film did not have it either, so JW: BBR actually does not stand out there either. What was the main message of the JP novels, especially the initial one? Life finds a way. This is what the novel version of Ian Malcolm, especially in the first novel, was talking about, however long-windedly and roundaboutedly. Everything else was just dressing, and the BBR post-credits scenes show precisely that. …The final scenes of JW: FK do that too, so no ground-breaking new achieves here in BBR either. The JP franchise goes round and round in circles, as does MCU’s AoS, for comparison, only AoS was doing it for longer and more continuously, proportionally speaking, therefore it is more obvious.

…And then we come to the Nasutoceratops. Whereas ‘Big Al’ had been a fan favorite of the American public for a long time, for a while it was second only to the Tyrannosaurus Rex as the best and most known North American carnivorous dinosaur, Nasutoceratops has been introduced to the general populace by the paleontologists only in 2013. Right now, it’s fall 2019, so let assume that people have known about the Nasutoceratops under 7 years. That’s not that long, so the fact that this dinosaur received several minutes of pure film footage is remarkable; yes, it’s a feature film of JP franchise and the Nasutoceratops’ role could’ve been taken over by any of its’ featured cousins, such as the aforementioned Triceratops or Sinoceratops – but it didn’t. JW: BBR and the rest of the JP franchise actually did something new, whereas Mr. Prothero in his ’25 discoveries’ went with the tried, tested, and old – Triceratops and Protoceratops, for example. Yes, Protoceratops fossils were possibly one source of inspiration for the griffin myth, this was acknowledged at least from the 1990s, if not earlier – is Mr. Prothero putting a brand new image for that story? No, not really – the bigger half of the 24^th chapter is about the Protoceratops and its’ discovery, and the rest is about Psittacosaurus, both tried and true dinosaurs, well known to the public. Unlike the JP franchise, Mr. Prothero is not about to talk about the brand new, but about the really old and well known – and in the last part of the 25^th chapter, Einiosaurus supposedly had a thick bony boss instead of a horn, just as Pachyrhinosaurus did.

…Einiosaurus – and this was established for a while – had a nasal horn and it jutting upwards and forwards like a horizontal hook or a sickle, whereas most horned dinosaurs had a horn that jutted either straight upwards, as in case of Monoclonius and Styracosaurus, or at an angle, as in case of Triceratops and Torosaurus. It is Nasutoceratops that actually lacks a nasal horn, and it is an established fact by now, so either Mr. Prothero has confused it and Einiosaurus, or there is some other gaffe. Ouch.

Let me start to wind down my rant. In the introduction to his ’25 discoveries’, Mr. Prothero may wax poetic about us living in the dinosaur renaissance. He is echoing the language used in the intro to Planet Dinosaur mini-series, (aired in 2011), but that is not the point. The point is that he, and the rest of the official paleontological world, are going around in circles, not unlike the rest of the Western/American society, going for old reliable while presenting them as brand new with nary an effort – and what effort there is, echoes directly back to 1970s and 80s, when the ‘dinosaur renaissance’ truly began in the first main mass media – printed books. These days printed media is decreasing in popularity, but officially, it is still going strong, and Mr. Prothero, at least, is trying to get his piece of happiness by publishing all sort of essay collections – but this is not the point. The point is that the entertainment sector of the Western/American mass media is being the pioneer here, with the official science lagging behind. That is just a sad state of affairs, people!

…And this is it for now; see you all soon!

Battle of Big Rock - Sep 16

Obligatory disclaimer: real life sucks, just ask the Saudis and the US allies, given how they have just lived through possibly one of the worst attacks on their oil fields…since WWII, maybe. So far, the suspect is supposedly Iran, which raises the question: are we at the start of WWIII? Just like the RF, Iran has had enough of the US hegemony, which grows steadily weaker ever since the US failure in Libya, (and now there are supposedly Russian mercenaries too – double ouch), while its’ European allies squabble with each other over the Brexit. Seriously, people, flip a coin – if it lands on one side, U.K. leaves, period, if it lands on the other – it stays, the end. Kind of like the end of the US/Israel hegemony in Middle East, apparently, as Iran isn’t backing down from a fight with the US and its’ allies anymore. When the G7 meeting took place earlier this year, everybody in the West (and their pro-West allies elsewhere) were extremely happy that Putin had not been there, but a certain high-ranking political representative of Iran was. Where are they now, those wise men and women of statecraft? Clearly, Tehran is just as hostile towards the West as Moscow is, if not more, so where does it leave the leaders of G7 and their allies?

…Yeah, with the Donald in the role of POTUS and a rising crescendo of political hysteria in general in the US, as the elections are coming closer, D.C. party lines are further apart than ever, and no idea of where to go next. If the Saudi Arabia falls before Iran, things will be very bad; the relationship between the two nations had been strained ever since the prophet Muhammed arose in the desert, united the formerly divided Arabian tribes and they conquered… yes, eventually, the Byzantine Christian empire, (what was left of it, eventually), despite the West’s interference, cough, but also the Persian empire of Zoroastrians, the nation that would in modern times become Iran. Now, it seems, the descendants of them Persians are about to unleash some karmic whoop-ass on the descendants of Muhammed’s devotees at last. Oh dear. Moreover, no one can blame it on Putin and the rest of RF either. Ouch.

…Well, this is depressing, so let us try to talk about something – JW ‘Battle of Big Rock’, perhaps? First, though, an honorary mention of AoS and MCU: they are bringing Hydra back officially. And to quote Ambroise Bierce, author and major in the US army (we are talking the American Civil War here of the 19^th century), ‘Why’? In the CA: CW movie Hydra was supposedly gone for good; yes, it came almost on every season of AoS, but AoS’ own relationship with MCU had plenty of problems; and moreover, the second Spider-Man movie seemed to be setting up the Kree as MCU’s next main villains, not Hydra, (which had been mostly human in the MCU so far).

If Hydra is coming back to MCU, this is going to be bad – the first time around it caused a rather nasty split between MCU’s fanbase – whether it was Nazi, or ‘only’ evil. Considering that this version of Hydra is a fictional organization, (rather than a mythical monster, for example), the argument was ridiculous, but there were many bad feelings generated by it until MCU ended Hydra in the CA: CW film. If it brings Hydra back in Phase 4, already burdened with the fallout from Spider-Man’s departure from MCU, as well as the acquiring of the X-Men and the Fantastic Four, then MCU might develop new problems on top of the old ones and that is bad, again.

…There are at least two probable reasons regarding this development. The first is that MCU was going to use the Kree in place of Hydra during Phase 4, as set up by the final scenes of Spider-Man II, (remember?), when Spider-Man left, the X-Men and the Fantastic Four came in, and suddenly MCU got shook up by all the new changes, and people in charge decided to scrap the Kree, go back to the tested and true Hydra just because. Too many changes too soon and Disney/Marvel may not control them. As said above, Hydra was more controversial in MCU than it was assumed, so bringing it back in place of the Kree completely might make the MCU situation even worse, so let’s go for the better option: MCU is going to conflate Hydra with the Kree, and then replace Hydra by the Kree as the Phase 4 unfolds, so the AoS S7 will be the final nail in the Hydra coffin…at least in the mainline MCU. What Disney/Marvel will bring out in place of AoS, (probably the Falcon & Bucky show on Disney plus), and whether it will feature Hydra, is another story. What is next?

The ‘Battle at Big Rock’ JW short movie. About 8 to 9 minutes long, it featured a diverse American family in California as they go on a camping trip in some fictional American national park in California, and get involved with the imported wildlife, as an Allosaurus fights it out with a Nasutoceratops family and then turns upon them. Hit the stop button.

Where to begin? First, in that perfect 20/20 hindsight, the Nasutoceratops profile was released by the Jurassic World Evolution game several weeks before today; if any’s interested, a Nasutoceratops is a cousin of Triceratops, but without the nasal horn and with a notable different muzzle from its’ much more famous cousin. Allosaurus, on the other hand, is a well-established dinosaur among paleontologists, dinosaur fans, and ordinary people; for a while, it was second only to Tyrannosaurus in its’ popularity in the West, but now it has been pushed back in favor of its’ cousins, dinosaurs like Carcharodontosaurus and Giganotosaurus, but it is still prominent. In BBR, however, it was hopelessly outmatched; no offense to all of the Big Al fans out there, but unlike Tyrannosaurus, who had evolved precisely for this sort of thing – to bite through bone and crush the reinforced skulls and frills of horned dinosaurs, (among other things), Allosaurus’ teeth and jaws were designed for shearing flesh of giant sauropods – just look at ‘Ballad of Big Al’, for example of the “Walking with…” series. When facing a dinosaur like the Nasutoceratops, Big Al was out of his depths.

…Yes, the Nasutoceratops was most certainly not in any of the franchise’s movies so far; in the last JW movie it was the Sinoceratops instead, a different Triceratops cousin. It had no brow horns, but a prominent nasal horn instead – essentially, a reversal of the Nasutoceratops’ arrangement. In the last JW movie, it fought a Carnotaurus; why the people of the JP franchise decided to use an Allosaurus this time is anyone’s guess. Maybe they were trying to change the dressings on what was basically a rehash of the JW: FK Carnotaurus vs. Sinoceratops fight? It is still anyone’s guess…

As for the human element, here we come to the second JP movie, ‘The Lost World’. This is the film in the franchise that the BBR resembles the most. Primarily, its’ second act, when Big Al goes for the family in the trailer is reminiscent of the scene in ‘The Lost World’, where Ian Malcolm and Sarah Harding are treating the juvenile Tyrannosaurus in their trailer, and its’ parents begin to object. As it happens in those movies, some of Malcolm and Harding’s entourage got eaten, but they and Malcolm’s daughter, who’s an Afro-American herself, just like the father and daughter in BBR – making, her, Malcolm and Sarah something of a mixed family themselves – survive.

Again, both Tyrannosaurus and Carnotaurus make much better dinosaurs for this sort of smash and grab attack – they both evolved for strength, in two different ways but along similar evolutionary lines, whereas Big Al was proportionally a more gracile hunter among the giant dinosaurs. (Plus, at 9 m in length on average, it was smaller than the Tyrannosaurus was, even if still bigger than the Carnotaurus). It really was not designed for this sort of punishment – being gored and tossed by the Nasutoceratops’ parents, and then being shocked, stabbed, shot and so on by the humans. No wonder that it had enough and just left in the end – and this brings us back to people: where did they go?

The obvious answer would be that they got eaten, but this is wrong: a solitary Allosaurus is precisely the wrong theropod dinosaur to eat several families of humans without making a noise. This dinosaur – and the rest of its’ carnosaur cousins – were pack hunters, working together to bring down giant sauropods, such as Diplodocus and Argentinosaurus, (to use the Impossible Pictures’ examples). When faced with several smaller prey items, an Allosaurus just did not have the mental hardware to deal with them – remember ‘The Ballad of Big Al’? The titular character’s downfall came when he tried to attack a herd of smaller, human-sized dinosaurs – Dryosaurs’ or Othnielias: Big Al chased them, they scattered, Big Al didn’t catch anyone, and actually broke one of his toes, and the fracture eventually got infested and he died. His relative in BBR did better – he didn’t die at the end of this short feature film, but he wasn’t doing very well either… but what about the humans? What happened to them, Greg and co.? The better option is that they got swallowed by a plot hole, but let us go with the other possibility: the Nasutoceratops family scared them away, and the main characters – actually, the only characters, you can say – just did not hear it due to their own noise. Ok, and this brings us to the ‘credit scenes’ and ‘The Lost World’.

Sure, one of the scenes featured a pterosaur eating a white dove released at a wedding and another one the Mosasaur eating a great white shark. Both of those animals escaped from the island and the Lockwood manor in the last movie, (though does it mean that the Mosasaur has reached South Africa or Australia by now, because that is where great white sharks and sea lions live these days; they also live in California, but the island was not off the American west coast, I think, so South Africa & Australia are more realistic here, ironically, but we digress). However, the other two short scenes featured, firstly, a girl chased and attacked by several compys. The same thing happened in the opening of ‘The Lost World’ film, which, in turn, were inspired by the opening scenes of the JP novel. (Read it). And secondly, we have a Stegosaurus attacking a car – again, we are talking ‘The Lost World’ here, where a different Stegosaurus attacked Sarah Harding. What does it all add up to, I have no idea, except that it is evidence that the franchise has lost steam: BBR is a rehash of ‘The Lost World’, the second JP movie, with some ‘Fallen Kingdom’ elements thrown into the mix. Put otherwise, and this is a rehash equal to some of the worst AoS/MCU rehashes, such as the return of Hydra, talked above. Where will this old rotten chestnut take MCU, (AoS is ending in 2020 for good now), is unknown, but proportionally, MCU is much more durable than the JP franchise; it is more likely to survive its’ bad decisions than the JP franchise – its’. Yes, the next JW movie is supposed to end this trilogy, but if it goes out with a whimper, it might be the end of the JP franchise for good, and I hope that that never happens…

…Well, this is it for now; see you all soon!