Monday, 30 January 2012

Jan 30, 2012


On today’s lecture we have covered the matters of the first Jewish diasporas, and how they were reflected in Jewish literature. To do that, we looked at Tobit, an interesting mixture of canon and apocryphal literature of between approximately mid-third and early second century B.C.E.
As far as literary works go, Tobit opens a window in the society of displaced Jews: the titular hero and his relatives live in foreign cities, and Tobiah, in particular, has to travel to meet, rescue and marry his cousin Sarah. In Genesis, Abraham’s wife Sarah too lives in a different place than Abraham, but what marks Tobit apart from Genesis is its’ marital urgency and the emphasis matter on family bonds. This reflects the difference in lives of the Jews when Genesis and Tobit were written: at the time of Genesis, the issue of Jews marrying Gentiles was not as acute as it was in Tobit, and Jews had not yet been driven out of Judea, forcing to be dispersed and come into a greater contact with the Gentiles. Still, this similarity implies that Tobit’s author was at least partially inspired by the story of Abraham and Sarah and had incorporated its elements into Tobit.
Another point of difference between Tobit and the saga of Abraham is the presence of Raphael the angel. By the standards of canon Old Testament, the story of Abraham is quite “angel-intense”, since usually God prefers to work behind the scenes, using people such as judges and prophets to do His work, while angels just deliver messages instead. Not so Raphael in Tobit – here he accompanies Tobiah to Sarah, gives him instructions, and helps him get rid of the demon Asmodeus who has plagued Sarah and killed her grooms before.
(This is another point of difference between Tobit and canon Bible: in canon Bible there are no demons; certainly no literal and corporeal demons as the one in Tobit. This, coupled with the fact that Tobit was written in Aramaic rather than Hebrew, confirms that Tobit is a much later work than Genesis, for example.)
Raphael the angel, Asmodeus the demon, and the magical fish that Tobiah captured and killed to rescue Sarah and his father are all elements not of the Biblical literature, but of the more basic folklore and magical fairy tales of the ancient Jews: Raphael the angel behaves roughly like Puss in the Boots aiding the hero Tobiah in rescuing his wife-to-be and his father. The speeches of Tobit the titular hero and Sarah, conversely, are much more biblical, reminding their audience of passages from Deuteronomy and reassuring them that the hard times of dispersion (such as Babylonian captivity in past) will pass, and God will punish the wicked and show mercy to the righteous and the true believers, no matter what hardships they will suffer before. This must have made Tobit popular in the past, though not popular enough to be included as canon – it was probably written too late for that, and had elements that may have been too frivolous or comic for the rabbis. Regardless, Tobit is still an educational and enjoyable novella and has attracted readers ever since it was written; I certainly had enjoyed reading it and hope that I will read more pieces like it in the future.

4 comments:

  1. Dmitri, I really like the way you analyzed Tobit. I felt some of the same things, that particular parts of the text seem very different from the rest of Biblical literature, with the seemingly folklore elements and what I found to be even some “un-biblical” characters and portions of the plot, but I like that you pointed out that there are some very “biblical” elements to Tobit as well. I also liked that you pointed out the similarities to the story of Abraham, the similar characters, plot, and other elements. I grew up reading and studying the story of Abraham in church, but for some reason I didn’t really draw any similarities from the story, let alone even think of the story. I also like that you drew many differences between the Abraham story and Tobit.
    You also made an interesting point about how Tobit must have been popular in the past, but not THAT popular, since it didn’t make it into the biblical canon. A thought that I had was maybe the reason that it didn’t make it into the canon was that it conflicted with the Abraham story. I thought that maybe the another reason for that was because the Abraham account is such an important element of the Hebrew Scriptures, Tobit wasn’t included in order to preserve the historic accuracy of the Abraham account and the rest of the historic narratives. Maybe this was done to avoid ambiguity, since there are differences in the two accounts, although they aren’t of the same exact story, some of the characters overlap and there are characters that do not show up in other biblical narratives. But nonetheless, Tobit is an interesting read!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad that you liked my blog entry. I have read the story of Abraham quite a few times, so some things just naturally "jumped" at me when I've read Tobit as well. And yes, maybe you're right about the historical accuracy reason as to why Tobit was left out - I don't really have any conclusions of my own yet.

      Delete
  2. Hi Dmitri I think you made some very valid points regarding the text of Tobit. You presented a great analysis regarding the difference between the book of Tobit and various other books of the Bible. I think that small details are very important when reading and analyzing texts as many different stories such as Genesis may present a story a little different than others. I used some of the same examples in my paper comparing the book of Genesis and the book of Tobit with the main difference between emphasis on family bonds. What i really liked in your blog is that you pointed out biblical elements of Tobit and the similarities you drew as well between texts. In reading sacred texts its very easy to identify similarities of texts but really hard distinguishing them apart. Little details such as angels containing different roles is very important. Interpreting and reading these texts and identifying small differences and similarities will help with real life situations. The book of Tobit in my opinion didnt make it into the biblical canon like mentioned above because of similarities to text. When there is a text like abraham that has great significance in the Hebrew bible and another text like Tobit that has such great similarities it may not be included or taken into consideration.Overall im glad that everyone agrees that Tobit is a very interesting read because it differs from so many texts. With the addition of humor I find the text excellent hoping for many like these to come. I also wanted to include that the book of Tobit has great comparison to Deuteronomy with the focus on exile and instruction. The story is also excellent because of providing instruction along with an apllausable setting. The folkore elements In my opinion are really great in the book of Tobit. Great blog looking for many more to come !!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your review and for taking time to write it. Yes, I agree that the Abraham story was very important to the Jewish culture and yes, that was one of the reason as to why it has inspired in part the Tobit story. I also agree that Tobit is different from the canon Biblical books and glad that you agree.

      Delete