Dorling Kindersley’s book of PREHISTORIC LIFE... what can be
said about it?
Firstly, it was intended as a book for children – that is
evident in wonderful, well-shot (or well-designed) illustrations: some
real-life photographs, some – 3-D images, some – drawn in more traditional
ways. It is evident in text, which mostly consists of a series of short
sentences and/or paragraphs, designed to give maximum of information in minimum
of text.
Secondly, despite the above-mentioned intent, what
PREHISTORIC LIFE comes across is a multimedia site made paper: the fact boxes
contain all sorts of asides that just distract the reader, and the images
themselves are different and distributed unevenly: most of 3-D images concern
the dinosaurs and other Mesozoic reptiles; the photographs (and other media)
concern other parts of the book.
Thirdly, the fact boxes themselves are uneven. Diplodocus,
Stegosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, Edmontosaurus
and Euoplocephalus are the most detailed fact boxes (among the
dinosaurs): the book’s writers, designers, other members of the staff team spent
most of their attention there, showing various details of the skeleton. Fair
enough. But the Iguanodon fact box shows only the bones of its front
limb – and there is no mention of the fact that Iguanodon and Megalosaurus
were the first dinosaurs to have ever been studied by scientists, which is
simply wrong and incorrect.
Then we have the intended audience of the book. As it was
mentioned before, the media element of PREHISTORIC LIFE aims at children, but the
abundance of actual scientific facts, the size and weight of the actual book (with
over 500 pages PREHISTORIC LIFE may not be heavier than an average brick, but
neither it is lighter), the cost of it make PREHISTORIC LIFE a very hefty and
doubtful gift for an average child: in this day and age they would rather look
up the dinosaurs, the pterosaurs and the mega-mammals on the Internet rather
than shift through the pages – for a lay person of a pre-teen/teen age that is
boring and tedious, and an adult will find the text of this book to be rather
childish and naive: “Monoplosaurus wasn’t related to Dilophosaurus”, “after
Tyrannosaurus Allosaurus is the best-known theropod” – no duh!
On their own, these factors are surpassable; combined they
spell extinction for PREHISTORIC LIFE as a successful encyclopedia and promise
more trouble for DK as a company.
No comments:
Post a Comment