Showing posts with label book. Show all posts
Showing posts with label book. Show all posts

Wednesday, 30 April 2014

Oops and SMALL and TALL TALES



First of all – oops. Last night’s episode of “Agents” is called “Nothing Personal” and it aired on April 29, not May 5, as it is self-evident. My bad, I had a rather exciting evening.

Second, I want to talk about a book called SMALL and TALL TALES of EXTINCT ANIMALS. This is a rather interesting book, albeit published primarily for children, about extinct animals, of course. It discusses 27 species of extinct birds and mammals – the odd animal out is Lonesome George the giant Galapagos tortoise, who is a reptile instead.

The book’s design is simple: it got a prologue, a map of where the extinct animals were located before they died out, the animals’ entries, a glossary of some of the more obscure terms and...not exactly an epilogue, but a ‘frieze’ of the animals, done in black silhouettes over a more colorful background – a rarity in many books.

Let me elaborate. The animals’ entries consist on one half, of a comic that tells some sort of an ancient myth or legend, makes some sort of an anecdote, depicts just how exactly the animal in question died out and why, etc. The other half is essentially a fact-box that depicts the animal’s statistics – just how big and heavy it was, what were its’ particular features (the horny plates of Steller’s sea cow,  the giant claws of the giant ground sloth, the tail of the Glyptodont, etc). Artwork dominates the text in the book, no doubt, but the half-comic half-factbox works – it conveys enough information for its audience (especially the younger readers) for them to understand what is going on (the animal has died out and this is why) and to be, hopefully, intrigued enough to continue to read about the modern animal extinctions and perhaps later on to do something about it – join the World Wildlife Fund or something...

The book’s other features are slightly more ambiguous. The book’s map, depicting where each extinct animal lived is rather simple – it is an ecological map, not a political one, it just shows the relative ecosystems of the world – the deserts, the jungles, the mountains – and where each animal lived. It is also colored-coded – the Americas’ animals are outlined by a different color than Africa’s or Eurasia’s or Oceania’s. The book itself is divided into four parts – Americas, Africa, Eurasia, Oceania – but there is no warning, no specified separation between the parts: for example, you flip over the page with Lonesome George and without any warning you’re suddenly dealing with African extinct animals instead. It is not very clever and subtracts any possibility of any intermediate conclusions being presented in EXTINCT ANIMALS. (The final conclusion is something else and will be discussed below.)

Second, there is the glossary. It discussed such terms as biodiversity, extinction and myths & legends. True, EXTINCT ANIMALS aims at children readers, rather than the grown-ups, but by now (the book was first published in 2010, translated into English in 2012) even children probably know what biodiversity or myths & legends mean. Thus, the glossary is probably unnecessary and again, it actually subtracts from the overall value of the book. 

Finally, the frieze in question. It creates a semi-panoramic timeline view of the 27 animals described by EXTINCT ANIMALS as it was said before, and it also acts as a conclusion of sort: it shows how the described animals have died out throughout the ages, as a rule – after coming into contact with men. This frieze just emphasizes the book’s message – all of these animals died out because of human action – one last time and is a rather effective medium, especially for a younger audience.

But what about the book’s message? Were humans responsible for all of the extinctions? Perhaps unintended by the makers of EXTINCT ANIMALS – Hélène Rajcak and Damien Laverdunt – show several waves of animal extinction during the last 15 000 years or so. The oldest mammals, the so-called mega-fauna of Pleistocene (and Pliocene, by extension), from the giant echidna of Australia to the woolly mammoth of Siberia (Eurasia) died out when humans were just beginning to make their mark on the world and probably had nothing to do with the following extinctions. However, the animals that died out during the last 2 000 years – yes, they probably perished due to human actions, whether you’re talking about the Sicilian dwarf elephant and the European lion (a subspecies of the modern lion, actually) or Chinese river dolphin and Lonesome George the giant tortoise, undoubtedly. During the Pleistocene, humans were still not numerous enough to affect the world around them – but during the Holocene (a la right now) they most certainly are: the frieze shows how the extinction process speeds up from the 1700s-1800s. 

Thus, the message of EXTINCT ANIMALS implies that and suggests that humans have to clean up their act or the Chinese river dolphin and Lonesome George (who died on June 24, 2012, two years after the book was originally published by Gecko Press) will be succeeded by more mammals, birds, reptiles and other animals – a message worthy enough to be thought about and to be, possibly, prevented.

Wednesday, 16 April 2014

PREHISTORIC LIFE - a book review



Dorling Kindersley’s book of PREHISTORIC LIFE... what can be said about it?

Firstly, it was intended as a book for children – that is evident in wonderful, well-shot (or well-designed) illustrations: some real-life photographs, some – 3-D images, some – drawn in more traditional ways. It is evident in text, which mostly consists of a series of short sentences and/or paragraphs, designed to give maximum of information in minimum of text.

Secondly, despite the above-mentioned intent, what PREHISTORIC LIFE comes across is a multimedia site made paper: the fact boxes contain all sorts of asides that just distract the reader, and the images themselves are different and distributed unevenly: most of 3-D images concern the dinosaurs and other Mesozoic reptiles; the photographs (and other media) concern other parts of the book. 

Thirdly, the fact boxes themselves are uneven. Diplodocus, Stegosaurus, Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, Edmontosaurus and Euoplocephalus are the most detailed fact boxes (among the dinosaurs): the book’s writers, designers, other members of the staff team spent most of their attention there, showing various details of the skeleton. Fair enough. But the Iguanodon fact box shows only the bones of its front limb – and there is no mention of the fact that Iguanodon and Megalosaurus were the first dinosaurs to have ever been studied by scientists, which is simply wrong and incorrect.

Then we have the intended audience of the book. As it was mentioned before, the media element of PREHISTORIC LIFE aims at children, but the abundance of actual scientific facts, the size and weight of the actual book (with over 500 pages PREHISTORIC LIFE may not be heavier than an average brick, but neither it is lighter), the cost of it make PREHISTORIC LIFE a very hefty and doubtful gift for an average child: in this day and age they would rather look up the dinosaurs, the pterosaurs and the mega-mammals on the Internet rather than shift through the pages – for a lay person of a pre-teen/teen age that is boring and tedious, and an adult will find the text of this book to be rather childish and naive: “Monoplosaurus wasn’t related to Dilophosaurus”, “after Tyrannosaurus Allosaurus is the best-known theropod” – no duh! 

On their own, these factors are surpassable; combined they spell extinction for PREHISTORIC LIFE as a successful encyclopedia and promise more trouble for DK as a company.