Thursday, 17 November 2016

Gray Jay - Canada's national bird? - Nov 17

Taking a break from Pathfinder & Worldscape, let’s get back to the real world. It seems that Canada has chosen its’ national bird this week, and it is the so-called gray jay, or the whiskeyjack.

So far so good, but if you are thinking that this is a differently colored version of the blue jay, you would be wrong. The gray jay belongs to a completely different genus of corvids than the blue and the Steller’s jays do, (or the pinyon jay does, for that matter). It is a long-tailed, medium-sized bird, colored more somberly than the most other American jays are – not in blue, but in much more somber coat of different shades of gray, with some whites and blacks thrown in for contrast and variation. It has no crest either, and its appearance is more delicate and songbird-like than a blue jay’s, for example.

Moreover, like many other corvids, the gray jay is an opportunistic and resourceful bird – it lives in Canada, rather than in U.S., (well, duh), but it does not fear people, and will sometimes steal their resources without any apprehension or anxiety for itself. Basically, it is a bird analogue of the gray squirrel from eastern Canada and U.S. And – it has a sticky saliva.

Gerald Durrell had encountered this bird and wrote about it in his book ‘How to Shoot an Amateur Naturalist’ – read it. It is a good book, especially for the fans of wildlife and animals. He depicted how a gray jay would take bits of food offered by him and his crew and stick it to nearby tree branches with its’ saliva. Go jay!

That said, while most of the American jays are exclusively American birds – (whether it is the blue and the Steller’s, the pinyon, or the scrub jays), the gray jay’s immediate relatives live in Asia: the Siberian jay that lives in Siberia, Russia, and the Sichuan jay that lives in Szechuan, China. Regardless of being closely related to each other, each of the three birds has a very distinctive look from the other two – they are individual species, not subspecies or any other variants, but…so what? Nowadays, there are plenty of people, never mind birds, who want to go to Canada, which brings me to my last point.

John Oliver, of whom I am normally a fan, has been in a dark place lately, since he proved to be a seer of some sort – he had foreseen not just the Cubs’ winning, but also Donald Trump, so now he, and most of the U.S. media will have to work with a president who is pointedly NOT a friend of theirs; they’d been humbled, and by whom? Donald Trump. So now John Oliver got vitriol coming out of his ears, (and so do the rest of his coworkers and counterparts), and it is understandable. But – the only reason to come to Canada if it is spring and you are a Canada goose (or a similarly Canadian bird)? Mr. Oliver, that is out of line.

Yes, as some Canadian author had written, if it was not for the American democracy, there would not be a Canadian one either, but he had also written that no one in Canada really knows how the U.S. democracy actually works. Put otherwise, U.S.A. and Canada might be neighbours, but they got two different ways of making a society work, and you know what? I am putting my foot down and saying that Canada is the better one. I am not comparing Donald to Trudeau, this is like comparing apples to oranges turned crazy, I am comparing the Canadian election to the American one: the stakes weren’t THAT lower in the former, but it was done with much more decorum than the latter, so, please excuse me, but Donald’s victory is symbolic – it’s symbolic of the fact that it was the American society in total, all social strata and variations has degraded its democracy so much; and Donald Trump – no. This is about the gray jay, and the other birds, and the fact that for once John Oliver is wrong: Canada is a fine country to live, and if you do not like the new president-elect, or any other features of the ‘new’ U.S. so badly, then it just might be the country for you.


Just listen to the gray jay and its distant blue-colored cousins: they whole-heartedly agree. 

No comments:

Post a Comment