Wednesday, 30 November 2016

S.H.I.E.L.D., Devils - Nov 29

AoS is back. Yay!

…As it does happen with this show, it did deliver on the latest episode – it introduced Hell (Dr. Strange’s Dark Dimension?); it pushed Coulson and May closer together (the two had an one-on, one-off relationship since S2); it gave much more backstory to Robbie Reyes/the Ghost Rider; it introduced senator Nadir’s InHuman brother; and etc. And?

And nothing. AoS was/is one of those shows that when its’ episodes work, they really work, and when they do not work, they really do not work. Here, in case of ‘Devils’, we got the former, but! It is a case of too little, too late: the next episode, 4x08, is the mid-season finale, meaning that the odds are that the entire S4 will be just 16, rather than 22 episodes long, are very good. ‘Course, there’s always a chance of the second half of S4 being 14 episodes long, but given the still-low ratings, I am not betting on it – we will just have to wait until 2017 to see.

As it was written before, AoS had problems, and starting from S2’s finale, AoS was unable to handle and resolve them, at least until the S3 finale. S4 is doing its’ best to have a clean break, but it has not quite succeeded in accomplishing this earlier, as I have suggested earlier. Moreover, with fewer episodes in S4 it has less space, and possibly less money, to accomplish this break as well.

Where does it live AoS with its’ S4 (and beyond)? Possibly in the same boat as the book ‘PRIMATES of the world’ by Jean-Jacques Petter and Francois Desbordes – it is a wonderful and initially impressive book, featuring numerous (nearly 300) species of lemurs, monkeys and apes on 72 colored plates, and is very aesthetically pleasing. But!

…But there is all that is too it, really. It does contain information about the primates, scientific rather than fictional, but it is generalized, unsorted, and is delivered at a compressed and rapid pace: minimum written information, maximum of illustrations and depictions. This approach is homogenous too, which makes things worse.

To be more precise, there are other guidebooks that have drawn illustrations rather than photographs; Luke Hunter’s guide to the carnivorous mammals of the world is one of them. Again, it uses drawings rather than photos, but the textual content of Mr. Hunter’s book is very different from that of Mr. Petter: it is heterogeneous – the textual entries are clearly of very differing lengths, as it should be. Both the snow leopard and the brown hyena, (for example), are predators and are related more closely to each other than to the grizzly bear, but they are just as different from each other as they are from the grizzly. Ergo – the entries of different lengths.

With ‘Primates’ it is different; the text is generalized as much as possible, and the format shows more creativity than common sense; I mean, you can put down the primates’ family tree in not a straightforward, back-to-front format, but rather a radial, left to right manner, but it doesn’t work as well. Or, you can sort the primates out primarily by continents rather than by infraorders, suborders and families, but it doesn’t work as well either – there is a reason why the Catarrhini are usually called the Old World monkeys and apes – they are found in both Africa and Asia; the Old World monkeys (Cercopithecidae) superfamily have subfamilies whose members are found both in Asia and Africa; while the apes’ family contain several genuses that are found in Africa and Asia as well. Mr. Petter did the best he could, but even so, he had to distribute his ‘flavor text’ about the Old World monkeys, the great apes (orangutans, gorillas and chimps), even about the Lorisoidea primates (aka the non-Madagascan lemurs) between African and Asian groups; it works, but not as well if he and Mr. Desbordes had sorted the entries evolutionary style – the lemurs, the tarsiers, (the link between the lemurs and the higher primates), the monkeys and the apes. Straightforward and simple. Mr. Hunter actually did this with the carnivores – one biological family after another, from cats to weasels. Mr. Petter and Desbordes just did not do it – well, history will judge them, if their contemporaries will not.

How does this relate to AoS? Well, as I tried to explain, ‘PRIMATES’ tried to create an aesthetically pleasant and scientific guidebook, (well, a quasi-guidebook, maybe) and failed. ‘PRIMATES’ is not much more than a picture book instead. AoS has tried to become an accessory/supplement to MCU – and failed. It tried to tackle ‘real-life’ issues in the second half of S3 (racial, international, etc.) and it did not work. S4 has new elements, but it also has a lack of any real-life issues, though it tries to do so with the InHumans as ‘the other’ in this season, but it does not really work. Of course, Marvel itself had thought that presenting Captain America (Steve Rogers) in comics as Hydra would be some sort of a clever anti-Trump statement, but it didn’t work, and just caused further friction among its’ fans.

In other words, AoS is back to being just entertainment – and for a while, (S3, S2 too), it was not even very good entertainment, and now that it has been sent to ten o’clock in the evening, things aren’t looking good for it. Yes, starting from S3 AoS tried to be good (as a TV show), but apparently it was not enough. In real life, bad guys sometimes win, and good shows are cancelled. ‘Course, being caught between the Netflix’s ‘Defenders’, who are coming up nicely, and CW’s DC ‘Arrowverse’ AoS is the underdog and it shows, especially in the ratings.

However, what about ‘Dr. Strange’? Can the latest MCU movie not help AoS and etc.?

‘Dr. Strange’ itself is primarily an entertainment movie, not unlike Disney’s ‘Moana’ that appeared in theatres not so long ago, only without ‘Moana’s’ depth. Okay, that was uncalled for, ‘Dr. Strange’ and ‘Moana’ have the same amount of depths – these days Disney owns Marvel as well. ‘Dr. Strange’ is a Disney movie with the main character become a hero, and a typical hero at that. At least CA: CW utilized the talents of its’ cast rather than special effects to carry it forth – and it worked. ‘Dr. Strange’…did not, and while it also worked, CA: CW is still the better movie by right.


Therefore: AoS is in trouble off screen, regardless of what it does on screen and things will not get better anytime soon, it especially with the midseason hiatus coming forth – this sort of thing is always bad for the ratings. Pity. 

No comments:

Post a Comment