Friday, 17 March 2017

Gilmore Girls II & co. - March 17

What to talk about? Well, I could talk about ‘The Catch’ – it was good in S1, now, in S2, it is even more exciting, in a good way: the cast and crew at that series has invested effort and enthusiasm into the series, and there is plenty of imagination to go around as well.

How is this important (in greater detail)? Just look at ‘Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life’ restart and compare it with ‘Fuller House’. Both shows tried to play on the nostalgia of their former fans but while ‘Fuller House’ had enough enthusiasm in its cast (and crew) to create endurance for the show, ‘Gilmore Girls’ didn’t. Both shows had flaws, but ‘Fuller House’ is going to have S2 – actually, it had had S2, ‘Gilmore Girls’ probably will not. Yes, its’ humor was sometimes somewhat racist or otherwise abusive, (especially by modern standards than by the 1990s standards); yes, the plotlines had plotholes, and the character development of the titular characters (and others) was often flawed, but so’s the case of ‘Fuller House’ – it may not be exactly racist, but neither was it perfect, period. So?

Okay, firstly the racial issue (sort of). Earlier this month, there was a new viral video, a very short one. Professor Robert Kelly was interviewed for BBC from his home, when his daughter (3-4 years of age) walked in, followed by his son, (a baby, 1-2 years of age) in his baby walker, and then his wife (Kim Jong-A) rushed in and got them (the children, the professor was left behind to finish his interview) out. The whole thing took less than a minute, (judging by the length of the clip), and personally, I think that the mother’s actions were the most distracting and messy. What next?
Next, BBC released a full online interview with Robert Kelly and his family, and there were also plenty of other online clips that showed the family in question. As the audience can see, this an interracial family, probably bilingual as well, (Kim Jong-A has some problems with speaking English, and since Robert Kelly works at the Pusan National University, he probably has a good grip on the Korean language), and progressive/liberal in their views, at least when it comes to raising their children: they are given the run of the house and trouble began after their mom forced them out of the room, (which is apparently their room with their toys). What is this has to do with GG?

Enter Lane Kim, (who is a Korean), and her husband, Zach, (who is Anglo-American). They are either some of the main characters, or some of the most important secondary characters, take your pick. Moreover, the Kims are probably the only Asian-American characters of GG, just as Michel was the only African-American character there, so, while GG probably were not racist, neither had they tried to make their show more racially diverse, in keeping in touch with the current socio-political times…

No, seriously, Trump’s approach to the racial issues is as incompetent as it is to everything else…and Obama’s was not better, (remember all those racial riots throughout his presidency?), but this is not just about the 45th president of the U.S., (or his cabinet, or the 44th president, or etc.). Rather, it is about the fact that by now, the Americans like to think of themselves as interracially integrated people and GG failed to reflect this.

Of course, neither does ‘Fuller House’, but ‘Fuller House’ is centered around a single family, (although a very big and unconventional one), whereas GG is centered around an entire town instead. These are two different scopes, you know? Would it kill ASP and her husband to integrate at least some POCs into the town – as background, episodic characters? Since there really were not any, apparently yeah, it would.

Instead, there was the line of the Star Hollow not having any gays, so shall we export some from the next town? It was said by Taylor Doose, (I think), who is not always a positive character, but still, with the Donald in power, this sounds slightly too much as what the 45th president can say under some circumstances or other, because it was tasteless. And that is a problem for the U.S. – it is not that the 45th president is incompetent, it is that he is tasteless and vulgar, and the same goes for his cabinet, and – for his critics, who often just spew vitriol from TV and computer screens without caring as to whom they can really hit. By now, the Americans themselves are tired of this sort of criticism, so it is going down, but do not worry – the anti-Russian hysteria and wiretap accusations and similar topics going around will compensate for that sort of thing nicely…

And with its’ government divided, does the U.S. think that it can take on North Korea and China, should it come to WWIII? Yeah, the odds right now are not in the U.S. favor: first resolve the inner division between each other, (I am talking Republican and Democratic parties here, plus every other third party involved), and then go back to adventures abroad.

If we get back to GG, the truth, again, is that they didn’t try to be deliberately racist, or openly insulting towards fat people – various reviewers felt that Melissa McCarthy/Sookie St. James had views regarding this, and she’s a prominent actress in Hollywood these days and she and the Pellegrinos possibly had a talk, so between this and her fee no wonder that Melissa-Sookie didn’t stick around for the new show.

However, enough with the conspiracy theories for the moment, the fact is that GG do not feel racist, they feel sloppy, slothful or lazy – people just did not want to get involved/invest their effort into it. Milo Ventimiglia, who played Jess Moriano, was openly unenthusiastic in his interview regarding the ‘next’ next installment of the GG saga, and without Jess the GG dynamic just falls apart so either Milo will change his mind, (for an appropriate amount of cash), or no more GG – and considering that the backlash of ‘A Year in the Life’ was already rather damaging to the original series, this doesn’t look good for GG…

And that is actually my next point: team GG did not put too much effort or imagination into the show’s revival because there was no enthusiasm, or at least – not enough enthusiasm, you know? ‘APB’, ‘Powerless’, ‘Making History’ ‘Time after Time’ and etc., have their flaws, but they also have enthusiasm, and consequently, they make plenty of effort to counterbalance for these flaws. GG did not. Hence – the fallout.

The same goes for the dilemma of ‘For Honor’ – sort of. As far as I’m concerned, ‘For Honor’ did deliver mostly what it promised to deliver – a very good fighting game, not unlike that of ‘Battlefield 1’, save that it is set in the Middle Ages…sort of. Whatever option you choose, you still get plenty of good fighting – and nothing else. Apparently, when it came to the campaign mode in foiling Apollyon’s plot, this was not good enough, and that is a real problem. Oh, it is not the only one, but most of the other problems are technical; ‘For Honor’ should fix them easily enough and keep on going…or fail to do so, and vanish into obscurity forever, as it deserves to. A bad story, however, is not fixed as easily, and ‘For Honor’ is ‘purely’ a game; it cannot be redesigned and reset with the same ease that, say, a TV series can…

Facepalm. What I meant to say here is that ‘For Honor’ will need to back away from all the intensity it had generated this February (2017) and revise its’ campaign story mode big time, so that the next edition/release/whatever has something different. After all, the conclusion of the campaign mode is kind of depressing: Apollyon died, the wars continued, almost everyone else died, there is no peace and the matter of honor is hanging in balance as well. Yeah, after the disastrous 45th presidential election this is just what the U.S. society needs – more doom and gloom. Maybe this is how the creative team of ‘For Honor’ thinks to introduce the new classes/characters/etc., but as I have written before, this probably is not the good/right idea that they think it is…

And that is that for today’s installment. GG is done, at least for the moment, ‘Fuller House’ is not, and neither is ‘For Honor’ (hopefully). See you next time.


No comments:

Post a Comment