Showing posts with label fighter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fighter. Show all posts

Monday, 26 December 2016

Pre-New Year Rant - Dec 26

And so, 2016 is almost coming to an end. Odds are, we will be celebrating New Year in the USA, where I will not be able to regularly access the Internet, most likely, so first, let me wish everyone a happy New Year beforehand.

Secondly, let us wish good luck and good riddance to 2016. With less than a week to go, we had a major airplane crush in Russia, (no survivors), death of George Michael in the U.K., and the fallout between U.S. and Israel in the U.N. The last is particularly WTF-worthy: throughout its existence, Obama’s administration, (and the man himself), was very slow-mo. Now, with less than a month left, it, including Obama itself, is trying to compensate for 8 years of missed chances and opportunities, by running around like some crazy chicken making one mess after another. (The only thing different between now and then is that now Obama is making his usual snafus at a breakneck speed, rather than slowly, as he did back then). Either way, I feel sorry for Obama; I am not the biggest fan of the Donald, but I can see why the Americans have voted for the latter: the man is an unknown entity, while Hillary would have just continued Obama’s plotlines and strategies, and the Americans had enough of this for the last 8 years.

…The problems is that Obama himself just continued the strategies of the Republican president George Bush Jr. in those last 8 years, so regardless of what the president-elect has promised has electorate, there is no guarantee that things will be fundamentally different after January 20th, 2017. People want variety, but they also want stability, and democracy is not very stable, (just ask the ancient Greeks – in Sparta they invented communism instead). With the election of Trump, the American society has once again put the plebeians/proletariat against the patricians/elite, and now both sides must figure out where to go from here. In Ancient Rome, it can be seen even in plays of Shakespeare – ‘Coriolanus’, ‘Julius Caesar’, ‘Anthony and Cleopatra’ – this conflict brought the end to the Republic, and paved way to the Empire. George Lucas, your Star Wars franchise says hi to the real world…maybe.

SW, incidentally, have developed its own issues: they do not know how to move forwards, now that the old canon has been declared apocrypha and redubbed ‘Star Wars: Legends’ instead. SW7 was very good, but it heavily relied on SW4 in terms of the script; ‘Rogue One’ is even better, but it is still set in the past, in the realm of the movies 4 through 6, (and it isn’t much different from some SW novels set in the ‘Legends’ universe. Still better than the real life U.S. politics, though).

Back in real life, there are not any breakthroughs or major shifts of the happy variety; in my own life…ditto. The TV and the like? Well, we have to look forwards the rest of ‘The Librarians’ S3. They seem to have conflated Horus and Ra – or confused him, but so did the ancient Egyptians. Ra was a sun god and the creator of the ancient Egyptian world. Horus was the brother and/or son of Isis and Osiris, (and just a brother of several other Egyptian gods); he was more of a war god instead. But! Both of them had the falcon as their sacred animal. Both of them had solar qualities in their divine portfolios. And! For a while, the ancient Egyptians worshipped both of them in the figure of Ra-Horakhty, so the differences between Ra and Horus are not important. What is important, (relatively speaking), that in S3, ‘The Librarians’ are faced with Apep, a snake-demon of darkness and night, and they are bringing a magical artefact of a sun god, (or the sun as a god) to challenge him. Frankly, they could have done the Greek version with Apollo and Python instead – it would be really similar, and as the S3 episode with the oracle has shown, they are keeping/have kept it in mind already.

…But still, this cavalier attitude towards the Egyptian mythology is grating. Rick Riordan and his novels were able to keep it straight; this really bad movie, ‘Gods of Egypt’, was able to keep it straight; so why ‘The Librarians’ cannot? Who knows…?

Then we have ‘For Honor’ game, by Ubisoft. It had appeared earlier in 2016, very exciting, but with flaws. Yet it continues to develop, and so far, it has appeared better than even before – not just with the new characters, but even a new game plan, that of Apollyon the warlord, who has to be stopped with plenty of melee fighting, maybe ranged too.

No, seriously, so far in all the game simulations, the combat was melee – but in the Apollyon promo, there are bows and arrows too, as well as combat-trained animals, maybe? Wolves and at least one war elephant… This game is shaping up to be really exciting, believe it!

The mention of war elephants reminds me of DW – I have been rewatching some of its episodes, the last one being ‘Ming Warrior vs. Musketeer’, which showed DW at its best. The hosts were unprejudiced; the tests showed the relative weaknesses and strengths of the various weapons, and the combat simulation was well orchestrated and interesting. The lack of prejudice really showed, too, as opposed to such S3 episode as ‘Hernan Cortez vs. Ivan the Terrible’, for example. For the first two seasons, DW was a good show, and then in S3 it went downhill so rapidly, that DW got cancelled – no funding, no staff, no anything. Even AoS has done better than DW – it is in its’ fourth season, remember?

…Mind you, for a while probably the entire MCU had problems: not only Luke Mitchell had left, but Jaimie Alexander (Sif) and Hayley Atwell (Peggy Carter) did, as well as who knows whom else. However, MCU – including AoS – survived. ‘Agent Carter’ did not…

Speaking of TW, a new show – ‘Riverdale’ – is coming to the screens in 2017. It is based on the characters from ‘Archie’ comics, but-

On one hand, Archie and his friends are very flexible. There were crossovers with the Predator movie franchise, the Walking Dead TV series, the Ramones’ music group, the Marvel comics (such as the Punisher, who might be getting his own TV series in MCU, BTW), etc. The ‘Riverdale’ adaptation – a soap opera/drama/mystery/etc. – is not very different. But-

On the other hand, ‘Archie’ was very demanding and particular when it came to its’ mark/brand/whatever. It generally took down the smaller folk who tried to use them for its’ own game, but when it came to someone more powerful – like the Marvel comics – it generally backed down first. Now, when faced with the CW and the ‘Archie’-based show, it seems to have reached a compromise with them: ‘Riverdale’ will keep the ‘Archie’-based character names, but the trademarks and everything else? It will probably something separate from ‘Archie’ comics instead. This is how ‘the Cursed Child’ works, after all. It is still a fanfic, but Ms. Rowling endorsed it at least to a point, for a part of the profits at least. Everyone got happy and we will have to see how ‘Riverdale’ works in 2017.

This is the end of this rant, and for now? Have a happy 2017!

PS: Here is a pallid vector ogrekin based on the new ‘Villain Codex’ rules:
OGREKIN (HALF-OGRE) CR 4
XP 600
Male human ogrekin fighter 2
CE Medium humanoid (giant)
Int +5; Senses low-light vision; Perception +1
DEFENSE
AC 16, touch 11, flat-footed 13 (+1 Dex, +6 natural)
hp 25 (2d10+10)
Fort +7, Ref +1, Will +1
Defensive Abilities bravery +1, pale rebirth
OFFENSE
Speed 30 ft.
Melee shortspear +7 (1d6+9 plus disease), bite +2 (1d4+4 plus disease)
Special Attacks disease
STATISTICS
Str 23, Dex 13, Con 22, Int 8, Wis 14, Cha 6
Base Atk +2; CMB +7; CMD 18
Skills Climb +12, Swim +12
Languages Giant
SQ deformities (oversized maw, weak mind)
ECOLOGY
Environment any
Organization solitary or family (2–6)
Treasure NPC gear (spear, other treasure)


Saturday, 24 December 2016

Pathfinder: Villains 1

Merry Christmas! Here are a couple of monstrous entries from the new Villain Codex with alternate racial traits!

BLUDGEONEER CR 4
Hobgoblin fighter 5
NE Medium humanoid (goblinoid)
Init +2; Senses Darkvision 60 ft.; Perception +0
DEFENCE
AC 18, touch 12, flat-footed 16 (+6 armor, +2 Dex)
Hp 47 (5d10+15)
Fort +2, Ref +3, Will +3; +1 vs fear
OFFENCE
Speed 20 ft.
Melee mwk Warhammer +11 (1d8+6/x3) or
Mwk Warhammer +9 (1d8+6/x3), mwk light hammer +8 (1d4+2)
Ranged mwk composite longbow +8 (1d8+3/x3)
Special Attacks weapon training (hammers +1)
STATISTICS
Str 16, Dex 15, Con 16, Int 8, Wis 10, Cha 12
Base Atk +5; CMB +8; CMD 21
Feats Bludgeoner, Iron Will, Skill Focus (Intimidate), Two-Weapon Fighting, Weapon Focus (Warhammer), Weapon Specialization (Warhammer)
Skills Intimidate +12, Stealth +8
Languages Common, Goblin
SQ armor training 1, bandy-legged, battle-heardened
Combat Gear poition of displacement, potion of jump; Other Gear +1 scale mail, mwk composite longbow (+3 Str) with 20 arrows, mwk light hammer, mwk Warhammer, 36 gp

CRUSHER CR 7
Orc barbarian 8
CE Medium humanoid (orc)
Init +1; Senses darkvision 60 ft., scent; Perception +11
DEFENCE
AC 16, touch 9, flat-footed 15 (+7 armor, +1 Dex, -2 rage)
Hp 105 (8d12+48)
Fort +12, Ref +4, Will +5; +4 morale bonus vs. spells, spell-like abilities and supernatural abilities, +2 racial bonus vs. nausea, sickened condition and disease
Defensive Abilities improved uncanny dodge, trap sense +2; DR 1/-
OFFENCE
Speed 40 ft. (30 ft. in armor)
Melee +1 heavy flail +17/+12 (1d10+11/19-20), gore +10 (1d8+3)
Ranged mwk composite longbow +8/+3 (1d8+5/x3)
Special Attacks rage (20 rounds/day), rage powers (fiend totem, lesser fiend totem, scent, superstition)
STATISTICS
Str 24, Dex 12, Con 21, Int 6, Wis 11, Cha 8
Base Atk +8; CMB +15; CMD 24
Feats Furious Focus, Power Attack, Raging Vitality, Weapon Focus (heavy flail)
Skills Intimidate +10, Perception +11
Languages Common, Orc
SQ dayrunner, fast movement, squalid

Combat Gear earth elemental gem; Other Gear +1 breastplate, +1 heavy flail, mwk composite longbow (+5 Str), with 20 arrows, cloak of resistance +1, 249 gp

Wednesday, 21 December 2016

Pathfinder: Warlord fighter - Dec 21

WARLORD CR 18
XP 153,600
Gnome fighter 19
N Small humanoid (gnome)
Init +7; Senses low-light vision; Perception +1
DEFENSE
AC 34, touch 18, flat-footed 29 (+11 armor, +2 deflection, +3 Dex, +2 dodge, +5 natural, +1 size)
hp 204 (19d10+95)
Fort +20, Ref +14, Will +11; +2 vs. illusions, +5 vs. fear
Defensive Abilities blink, bravery +5, defensive training (+4 dodge bonus to AC vs. giants); DR 10/—
OFFENSE
Speed 40 ft.
Melee+2 longspear +30/+30/+25/+20/+15 (1d4+12/19–20/×3) 
Ranged radium pistol +27/+27/+22/+17/+12 (1d4+7/x4)
Special Attacks +1 on attack rolls against goblinoid and reptilian humanoids, weapon training (firearms +4, thrown +3, close +2, hammers +1)
Gnome Spell-Like Abilities (CL 19th; concentration +20)
STATISTICS
Str 18, Dex 16, Con 20, Int 13, Wis 8, Cha 12
Base Atk +19; CMB +23; CMD 39
Feats Blind-Fight, Combat Expertise, Disruptive, Dodge, Endurance, Exotic Weapon Proficiency (radium pistol), Improved Critical (longspear), Improved Initiative, Iron Will, Nimble Moves, Persuasive, Power Attack, Quick Draw, Spellbreaker, Step Up, Weapon Focus (longspear), Weapon Specialization (longspear)
Skills Bluff +19, Diplomacy +18, Intimidate +30, Knowledge (nobility) +13, Perception +1, Profession (gambler) +5, Sense Motive +18
Languages Common, Gnome, Sylvan
SQ battle bravado +4, evasive dueling +3, sun-bronzed skin
Combat Gear potion of barkskin (CL 12th), potion of bear's endurance, potions of cure serious wounds (2); Other Gear bracers of armor +2, +2 longspear, radium pistol (6 cartridges), belt of giant strength +4, boots of speed, circlet of persuasion, cloak of resistance +4, hat of disguise, ring of blinking, ring of protection +2, ruby signet ring (worth 1,000 gp), 5,075 gp

So, I took a fighter from the NPC gallery sourcebook and rebuilt him as a new archetype. What do you think?